16 January 2025

Rise of the Nonaligned

Matias Spektor

The global South has been a net winner from the shifts in global power over the last two decades. The growing influence of emerging economies, the rise of China as a great power, tensions between the United States and its European allies, and increasing great-power competition have given these countries new leverage in global affairs. They have taken advantage of these shifts by building new coalitions, such as BRICS (whose first members were Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa); strengthening regional alliances, such as the African Union; and pursuing a more assertive agenda at the UN General Assembly. From championing the Paris agreement on climate change to taking Israel to the International Court of Justice, the global South—the broad grouping of largely postcolonial countries in Africa, Asia, Latin America, and the Middle East—has shown a greater willingness to challenge Western dominance and redefine the rules of the global order.

An “America first” foreign policy would seem to put those gains at risk. During his presidential campaign, Donald Trump promised to hit developing countries where it hurts most: raising tariffs that will throttle exporters in developing countries; normalizing the mass deportation of migrants, whose remittances are essential for the economies of many countries in the global South; and withdrawing from global environmental agreements that provide crucial support to those people disproportionately affected by the climate crisis. His proposed economic policies will probably lead to inflation at home, with devastating knock-on effects for developing countries as interest rates rise globally and credit becomes more expensive for economies already burdened by debt. His commitment to targeting China may make it harder for Beijing to continue serving as an alternative market and source of investment for much of the world.

Trends In Terrorism: What’s On The Horizon In 2025? – Analysis

Colin P. Clarke

Sitting down to write my annual assessment on trends in terrorism in early 2025, I am struggling more than usual, fresh off the horrors of an Islamic State (ISIS)-inspired terrorist attack in New Orleans that killed fourteen people and injured dozens more. It is always a challenge to look beyond the immediate, to take a step back and weigh myriad factors and variables that impact which trends may accelerate and which may disappear.

It is impossible to know whether the New Orleans attack suggests a “new wave” of ISIS-inspired attacks in the West and in the United States in particular. Rather, the attack is another data point that demonstrates what many in the counterterrorism community have been saying ad nauseum for years—the threat posed by ISIS is consistent, enduring, and likely to ebb and flow over time in response to geopolitical events and counterterrorism pressure. Still, the threat is enduring and will remain an uncomfortable truth for policymakers as they attempt to right-size the resources provided to counter-terrorism agencies with their agreed-upon level of risk tolerance.

Satellite War! China “Hunts” Hundreds Of Starlink Satellites In Simulation Ops As Musk’s Internet Worries PLA

Sakshi Tiwari

A team of Chinese scientists simulated a space operation targeting the Starlink constellation, proving that the massive network is not as invulnerable as originally believed, according to a new report in the Hong Kong-based South China Morning Post.

A peer-reviewed paper on the simulation, curated by the team led by Wu Yunhua, director of the aerospace control department at Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, was reportedly published in the Chinese academic journal Systems Engineering and Electronics on January 3.

The computer simulation found that about 1,400 Starlink satellites could be successfully approached by just 99 Chinese satellites in about 12 hours. These satellites may be outfitted with lasers, microwaves, and other tools to carry out tracking, reconnaissance, and other operations.

“The potential military application value of the Starlink mega constellation has been highlighted in the Russia-Ukraine conflict. In recent years, the militarization of space has intensified, posing a significant threat to China’s space security. It is particularly important to track and monitor its operational status,” wrote the project team.

Joe Biden Proposes Major New AI Rules To Combat China

Theo Burman

President Joe Biden has proposed a new framework to limit the export of advanced computer chips used to develop artificial intelligence.

The Biden administration outlined a series of rules with the aim of "keeping the world's AI runs on American rails," by placing restrictions on which countries U.S. companies can sell advanced chips to.

Newsweek contacted the White House for comment.
Why It Matters

Though the White House did not explicitly mention China in the regulations, the Asian nation is the U.S.'s top competitor in the AI space.

The new framework features a list of "countries of concern" that the White House fears will challenge U.S. leadership in the industry, restricting companies' ability to do business with these nations.

With a TikTok Ban Looming, Users Flee to Chinese App ‘RedNote’

Zeyi Yang

As TikTok anxiously awaits a Supreme Court decision that could determine whether it will be banned in the United States, users are preemptively fleeing the app and migrating to another Chinese social media platform called Xiaohongshu, which literally means “little red book” in Mandarin. As of Monday, Xiaohongshu was the number one most-downloaded app in Apple’s US App Store, despite the fact that it doesn’t even have an official English name. The second app on the list is Lemon8, another social media app owned by TikTok’s parent company, ByteDance, that is also experiencing a traffic surge from exiled TikTok users.

Over the weekend, thousands of people began swarming to Xiaohongshu, which is known in China as a platform for travel and lifestyle content and has over 300 million users. The newcomers, who refer to the app as “RedNote” or “the Chinese version of Instagram” and call themselves “TikTok refugees,” are relying on translation tools to navigate Xiaohongshu’s mostly Chinese ecosystem. Some say they are hoping to rebuild communities they had on TikTok, while others say they joined the app out of spite and to undermine the US government’s decision to ban TikTok over concerns that the Chinese government could use the app to surveil Americans.



China’s Export Boom Means Trump Tariffs Would Hit Beijing Where It Hurts

Jason Douglas

China’s economy is more dependent on exports than it has been for most of the past two decades, leaving it vulnerable to a new broadside on trade from President-elect Donald Trump.

Chinese exports to the rest of the world grew 5.9% last year compared with a year earlier to $3.6 trillion, figures published Monday showed.

Those figures mean trade is on track to account for about a fifth of the 5% or so growth China is expected to report this year.

Aside from 2021, when consumers the world over were gorging on Chinese-made home appliances, fitness equipment and computer gear during Covid-19 lockdowns, that would mark trade’s biggest contribution to Chinese economic growth since 2006, when China’s exports were surging in the aftermath of its accession to the World Trade Organization in 2001.

China’s growing reliance on foreign purchases of manufactured goods to power growth reflects its economy’s struggles with a yearslong real-estate crunch and tepid consumer spending.

A Spymaster Sheikh Controls a $1.5 Trillion Fortune. He Wants to Use It to Dominate AI

Bradley Hope
Source Link

For a while in the mid-2000s, a refrigerator-sized box in Abu Dhabi was considered the greatest chess player in the world. Its name was Hydra, and it was a small super-computer—a cabinet full of industrial-grade processors and specially designed chips, strung together with fiber-optic cables and jacked into the internet.

At a time when chess was still the main gladiatorial arena for competition between humans and AI, Hydra and its exploits were briefly the stuff of legend. The New Yorker published a contemplative 5,000-word feature about its emergent creativity; WIRED declared Hydra “fearsome”; and chess publications covered its victories with the violence of wrestling commentary. Hydra, they wrote, was a “monster machine” that “slowly strangled” human grand masters.

True to form as a monster, Hydra was also isolated and strange. Other advanced chess engines at the time—Hydra’s rivals—ran on ordinary PCs and were available for anyone to download. But the full power of Hydra’s 32-processor cluster could be used by only one person at a time. And by the summer of 2005, even the members of Hydra’s development team were struggling to get a turn with their creation.

That’s because the team’s patron—the then 36-year-old Emirati man who’d hired them and put up the money for Hydra’s souped-up hardware—was too busy reaping his reward. On an online chess forum in 2005, Hydra’s Austrian chief architect, Chrilly Donninger, described this benefactor as the greatest “computer chess freak” alive. “The sponsor,” he wrote, “loves to play day and night with Hydra.”


Machiavelli and our Wars in the Middle East

Chad Pillai

The upcoming twentieth anniversary of the September 11th attacks and the recent passing of former Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld require thoughtful attention as the nation completes its final troop withdrawal from Afghanistan, ending the longest war in U.S. history. The war in Afghanistan and the subsequent wars in Iraq and Syria have shaped my generation’s cultural image, similar to the Vietnam War’s generation. In both instances, the U.S. entered the wars believing its martial superiority ensured victory and ended each war wondering what went wrong.

The political, strategic, and emotional rationale for the war in Afghanistan was logically tied to the heinous attacks on September 11th. The world watched as Al Qaeda hijacked commercial airliners and flew them into the World Trade Center, the Pentagon, and one that crashed in Pennsylvania when the passengers revolted. Shortly after the attack, President George W. Bush spoke with first responders at ground zero in New York. He announced, “the world will hear all of us soon!” Within weeks, the CIA and U.S. Special Operations spearheaded our response in Afghanistan that led to the U.S. overthrowing the Taliban government and the displacement of the Al Qaeda terrorist network. The rapid victories represented by the famous “Horse Soldiers” of the 5th Special Forces Group highlighted the nation’s martial superiority. They gave strategic leaders like former Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld the confidence needed to expand the global war on terrorism to Iraq.

The Fall Of Syria’s Assad Regime Is Bad News For Libya – Analysis

Peter Fabricius

For Russia, as for Iran, last month’s fall of the 54-year-old Assad dynasty in Syria was a major geo-strategic setback. Former Syrian president Bashar al-Assad’s sudden defeat threatened Russia’s important military presence in the eastern Mediterranean.

Now Moscow is believed to be trying to negotiate a continued presence with the new Syrian authorities. But it is also transferring military equipment from Syria to nearby Libya, apparently to establish or strengthen Russia’s presence in that country as a new hub for its African operations. This could seriously damage efforts to resolve Libya’s protracted conflict.

The end of al-Assad’s regime also has repercussions for Russia’s growing presence across Africa. Moscow’s naval and air bases in Syria have been the hubs for supplying Russia’s continental operations – mainly in Libya and also in Mali, Niger, Burkina Faso, Central African Republic and Sudan.

Assad hosted a major Russian military presence in Syria with a warm-water naval base in the port of Tartus, an air base at Khmeimim to the north near the port of Latakia, and a helicopter base at Qamishli in the far northeast.

When Russia Fights the Wrong Enemy

S.C.M. Paine

Like Czar Nicholas II, Russian President Vladmir Putin has misidentified his primary foe. Fighting a war of choice, he allows the real menace to his country to gather strength. China, not Ukraine, constitutes Russia’s existential threat. In the Russo-Japanese War (1904-05), Nicholas fought Japan over Manchuria for concessions that Russia could not monetize, instead of investing in the railways and munitions needed to fight the country’s actual enemy, Germany, a decade later.

Defeat in World War I cost Nicholas and his family their lives after the Bolsheviks seized power. Nobles who did not suffer the same violent fate as the czar fled abroad, often dying in penury.

The West and Ukraine never intended to invade Russia, let alone take its territory. Who in the West would want it? China, on the other hand, very well might. Its long list of grievances dates back centuries, to the czars who removed large swaths of territory – an area larger than the United States east of the Mississippi River – from China’s sphere of influence.

Putin’s invasion of Ukraine was a pivotal error – the type that precludes a return to the pre-war status quo. Instead, such errors lead to alternatives that are far less desirable. The question is not whether Russia will lose the Ukraine War (in strategic terms, it already has), but only how big the loss will be.

US Ally Challenges Chinese Ships As Dispute Flares Up

Micah McCartney

The Philippines says that it temporarily blocked the largest vessel in China's Coast Guard fleet—and the world—from sailing closer to the coast of the heavily populated island of Luzon, amid the ship's dayslong deployment in the U.S. ally's maritime zone.

Newsweek reached out to the Philippine Coast Guard and Chinese Foreign Ministry with emailed requests for comment.

Why It Matters

China's coast guard, paramilitary "Maritime Militia," and—increasingly—naval forces have added muscle to Beijing's claims, in what many analysts consider to be "gray zone" operations, or coercive acts that stop short of war. Chinese forces have responded to Philippine President Ferdinand Marcos Jr.'s pushback with blockades of disputed reefs, water cannon attacks, and ramming.

What To Know

China asserts sovereignty over most of the trade-heavy South China Sea as its territory, rejecting the 2016 decision by an international arbitral court that largely dismissed these sweeping claims, which overlap with the exclusive economic zones of the Philippines and several other neighbors. An EEZ is an area extending 200 nautical miles (230 miles) from the coastline, within which maritime law accords a country sole access to natural resources.

Russian Economy Time Bomb: Putin Warned of 'Seismically Disruptive' War Debt

Brendan Cole

Russia is financing its military spending through a shadow plan that poses a "seismically disruptive" threat to an economy already buffeted by high inflation and interest rates, according to an analysis.

Craig Kennedy, a former Morgan Stanley investment banker, has described how the Russian state requires banks to issue preferential loans to military firms that are making President Vladimir Putin's war effort in Ukraine possible.

That gives the Russian economy a better bill of health, misleading experts into thinking that Putin can continue with record military spending without any adverse effects to the country's finances, according to Kennedy.

Newsweek has contacted by email the Russian Finance Ministry, Russia's central bank and Kennedy for comment.

Why It Matters

Despite facing tough sanctions, Russian state media said there is GDP growth forecast of 2.5 percent in 2025, but it comes amid a high inflation rate of 8.9 percent, which has been stoked by a worker shortage and a record key interest rate.

A New Playbook? Russian Interference in Georgia and Moldova Elections - Opinion

Marcus Andreopoulos

As 2025 begins, the end of last year saw two significant results in Georgia and Moldova, demonstrating both the strengths and limitations of Russian interference operations. Both former Soviet Republics are high up on Vladimir Putin’s priority list, so much so that following Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, the pair, alongside Bosnia and Herzegovina, were identified as ‘partners at risk’ by the NATO alliance. Expectedly, the Kremlin’s obsession with the two countries was on full display with allegations of interference rife in both elections.

Despite the Kremlin’s efforts, the pro-Russian party was only victorious in Georgia, with Georgian Dream securing a parliamentary majority. In Moldova, on the other hand, the pro-EU candidate, and incumbent, Maia Sandu won re-election as president. Limited success notwithstanding, both elections provide an example of the methodology employed by Russia to interfere with democratic elections, as well as providing ominous warnings of Europe’s future should Ukraine be defeated.

Russia’s pleasure was on full display following Georgian Dream’s victory on 26 October, as the head of the Russian state-controlled broadcaster RT, Margarita Simonyan, triumphantly declared that ‘Georgians have won.’ Despite having held power since 2012, Georgian Dream was not widely projected to win; protests against the party had been strong throughout 2024, and turnout on election day was high. Change was expected. However, existential arguments about saving Georgian democracy did not appear to resonate when pitted against Georgian Dream’s assertions that the opposition would take the country to war with Russia.

The U.S. is unprepared for a major war. Can Pete Hegseth fix that? - Opinion

Max Boot

Tuesday’s confirmation hearings for defense secretary are sure to focus on all the troubling allegations of misconduct swirling around intended nominee Pete Hegseth (which he has denied). But let’s not lose sight of the big picture. The essential question that senators must ask is whether Hegseth, a Fox News host and former National Guardsman, has the capacity and experience to prepare the armed forces to fight a major war — and, if so, how he would go about it. Because right now, the U.S. military simply is not ready to defeat an adversary such as China or Russia in a protracted conflict.

Don’t take my word for it: That’s the judgment of the congressionally chartered, bipartisan Commission on the National Defense Strategy, which issued its final report in July. The commission, chaired by former California congresswoman Jane Harman, came to a sobering conclusion that did not get the attention it deserved: “The threats the United States faces are the most serious and most challenging the nation has encountered since 1945 and include the potential for near-term major war. … The nation was last prepared for such a fight during the Cold War, which ended 35 years ago. It is not prepared today.”

The commission went on to warn that “China is outpacing the United States and has largely negated the U.S. military advantage in the Western Pacific” and that “the U.S. military lacks both the capabilities and the capacity required to be confident it can deter and prevail in combat.”



Donald Trump’s Rush for Ukraine Peace Talks Could Be a Giant Mistake

John Bolton

During the 2024 campaign, candidate Donald Trump said he could resolve the Ukraine war in twenty-four hours by getting together with Vladimir Putin and Volodymyr Zelensky to thrash things out. At a January 7 press conference, President-elect Trump conceded it could take up to six months.

Call that learning.

Trump fundamentally wants the war to disappear. He has said repeatedly it would never have occurred had he been President, as he has also said about the ongoing Middle East conflict. Of course, these statements are not provable nor disprovable, but they reflect his visceral feeling that the wars are Biden’s problem and should disappear when Biden does.

Neither war will disappear so quickly, but Trump’s comments strongly suggest that he is indifferent to the terms on which they end. That is likely bad news for Ukraine, though it could be good news for Israel in its struggle against Iran’s “ring of fire” strategy.

The Ceasefire Challenge: Good or Bad Idea?

As Inauguration Day nears, little information is publicly available about what Trump will do. And, because he has neither a coherent philosophy nor a strategic approach to foreign affairs, what he says in the morning may not apply in the afternoon.

Is it Time to Finally Put Someone in Charge of Waging America’s Irregular Wars? - Opinion

Charles T. Cleveland & Daniel Egel

The United States is now learning that terrorism – which defined America’s national security posture during the first two decades of the 21st century – was just the leading edge of a broader national security risk facing the nation.

Consolidating America’s approach to irregular warfare in a single high-level agency could help the U.S. address this larger and growing risk, and ultimately win.

The New National Security Challenge

By maintaining deterrence in nuclear and traditional war, the United States has forced adversaries to turn to a version of Kennan’s political warfare and its offensive component –irregular warfare – to achieve their objectives.

Through lawfare, economic means, foreign malign influence, material support to “fifth columns,” and sabotage, these adversaries are demonstrating the willingness, capacity, and capability to combat the United States and stay below the threshold of traditional war. Chinese merchant vessels dragging anchors in the Baltic Sea, Iranian drones in Ukraine, North Korean troops fighting in Europe, and expanding Chinese-Iranian-North Korean-Russian cooperation in the ongoing information war are indications beyond early warning that a global irregular war against America and her allies and friends is well underway.

Gradually, Then Suddenly: In Geopolitics, Decades Can Happen in Weeks

Michael Pezzullo

For centuries, political structures and hierarchies of power that once were thought to be unchanging often suddenly vanished. Demise was gradual but collapse was sudden.

The Russian Empire (abolished in September 1917) and the Soviet Russian empire (dissolved in December 1991) both exhibited permanence—until they did not. So did the Austrian-Hungarian Empire (abolished in October 1918) and the Ottoman Empire (abolished in November 1922).

Only last month we witnessed the sudden collapse of Bashar al-Assad’s Syria. Rulers in Beijing, Moscow, Tehran, Pyongyang, Havana and elsewhere nervously understand the Hemingway rule, even if they have never read him.

There is another way to express this rule. After decades when nothing happens, decades can suddenly happen in weeks (a saying that is attributed to Vladimir Lenin). While we expressed hope on New Year’s Eve for a more peaceful and less chaotic world, one senses that as 2025 unfolds we will see decades suddenly happen in a blaze of geopolitical twists, turns and transformations.

The scene is bewildering. What will happen in the Russo-Ukrainian war? Will a peace deal be reached? Will Vladimir Putin keep his grip on power? Will Israel go to war against Iran? Will Iran recover from recent setbacks or will the regime start to unravel? Will it make a dash for nuclear weapons?

US Army wants spy drones to launch from high-altitude motherships

Jen Judson

The Army is scouring industry for unmanned aircraft systems to launch from medium- or high-altitude platforms that would perform tasks like intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance, according to a request for information posted to the federal business opportunities portal Sam.gov.

The Special Electronic Mission Aircraft Product Directorate, part of the Army’s Fixed-Wing aircraft Project Office, plans to demonstrate operational capability in the fiscal 2026 timeframe, the notice states.

The “Launched Effects” systems, or LE, would be integrated onto “the hardpoints” of an executive jet category aircraft, such as a Bombardier G6500, which would operate above 41,000 feet mean sea level and would reach true airspeed of above 400 knots for more than seven hours. This means the LE and its sensors would need to survive in an air temperature 65 degrees below zero for lengthy durations.

Battlefield Drones and the Accelerating Autonomous Arms Race in Ukraine

Samuel Bendett and David Kirichenko

Since Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, the war there has been impacted by attritable, cheap drones and rapidly growing roster of unmanned and robotic systems. Collectively, these technologies are redefining how military forces can wage modern warfare. With both sides in this war rushing to secure a technological advantage, the Ukrainian battlefield is transforming into a clash between conventional forces backed by a growing number of autonomous and remote-controlled systems. Both Ukraine and Russia have steadily poured more and more resources into developing this technology in a bid to stay a step ahead of the adversary.

Ukraine’s battlefield experience reflects a shift toward unmanned systems that augment or attempt to replace human operators in the most dangerous missions, and against an enemy willing to send more and more manpower into large-scale frontal assaults. After so many autonomous and robotic systems were fielded over the past three years by Kyiv’s forces, Ukrainian officials started to describe their country as a “war lab for the future”—highlighting for allies and partners that, because these technologies will have a significant impact on warfare going forward, the ongoing combat in Ukraine offers the best environment for continuous testing, evaluation, and refinement of such systems. Many companies across Europe and the United States have tested their drones and other systems in Ukraine. At this point in the conflict, these companies are striving to gain “battle-tested in Ukraine” credentials for their products.

Maduro Signals Readiness for Armed Conflict Amid Global Opposition: 'We Will Fight the Battle'

Carola Guerrero De Leรณn

One day after being sworn in for a third term as Venezuela's president, Nicolรกs Maduro addressed widespread international opposition, stating that Venezuela, along with its allies Cuba and Nicaragua, is "preparing" for the possibility of armed conflict.

The announcement was made on Saturday as part of the Global International Anti-Fascist Festival celebrated in Caracas. More than 2,000 international delegates from 125 countries participated, according to CMH, a Cuban state-run radio news outlet known for its coverage of government and international affairs.

Maduro closed the festival with the following speech, positioning himself and Venezuela's leadership as defenders of the nation's sovereignty:
"Venezuela is preparing itself, together with Cuba, together with Nicaragua, together with our elder brothers of the world, so that if one day we have to take up arms to defend the right to peace, the right to sovereignty, and the historic achievements of our homeland, we will fight the battle and win it again.

Ukraine’s Kursk Offensive: Symbolic Gains, Strategic Costs?

Paulo Aguiar

The Kursk offensives, launched by Ukraine in August 2024 and January 2025, have been some of the boldest military moves in the ongoing war against Russia. With quick, aggressive pushes into Russian-held territory, these offensives were meant to challenge the idea of Russian military invincibility and shift the balance of power on several fronts. While the success of the first offensive gave Ukraine a much-needed morale boost and a symbolic victory, the long-term impact remains unclear. As Ukrainian forces continue their push in the second offensive, it’s becoming apparent that, despite its symbolic importance, the Kursk region offers limited economic and strategic value compared to the high-stakes areas in the east and south of the country. This conflict underscores the complex challenges Ukraine faces: defending its sovereignty while balancing limited resources, international support, and the heavy psychological toll of war.

The First Kursk Offensive: August 2024

The first Kursk offensive, launched on August 6, 2024, was a bold and unprecedented move by Ukraine into Russian territory. Ukrainian forces combined mechanized infantry and precision artillery to deliver a swift, well-coordinated attack that caught Russian defenders off guard. Within days, they had advanced deep into the Kursk region, capturing about 1,250 square kilometers, including the strategically important town of Sudzha. This marked a significant victory for Ukraine—not just militarily, but symbolically—as it demonstrated the country’s ability to challenge Russian forces on their own soil, defying Moscow’s carefully curated image of military dominance.

Hypersonic Missiles - A 21st Century Operational Need

Francis G. Mahon & Punch Moulton

Hypersonic missiles, capable of traveling at speeds in excess of Mach 5, will alter warfare’s strategic and operational environments in the 21st century. They are the technology that will drive and shape future near-peer or large-scale combat operations. Nations that possess hypersonic missiles will have a decisive advantage.

For the U.S., hypersonic missiles will provide Combatant Commanders with a responsive, precise, long-range strike capability—an invaluable capability which cannot be achieved today without placing a manned aircraft at risk. American-owned hypersonic missiles present a complementary capability that extends the limited reach of today’s strike or fires capabilities. They provide strategic reach, a new offensive layer that reduces sanctuary and redefines deep fires. The lessons of Ukraine affirm this need.

Time-sensitive targets—those fleeting, high-value, and high-payoff targets, which are often beyond the reach or responsiveness of today’s strike capabilities—will now be at risk of being rapidly targeted by hypersonic missiles. A hypersonic missile’s speed, coupled with a dynamic targeting process, will allow rapid response and effective fires to be placed on an adversary’s command and control systems or fleeting weapon systems.

Command and Control and AI, Oh My! – The Case for Petrov’s Law –Opinion

Christopher J. Heatherly

A War Story

September 26th, 1983. The height of the Cold War between the Soviet Union and the United States of America. Lieutenant Colonel Stanislav Petrov, assigned to the Soviet Air Defense Forces, stands watch at a nuclear attack early warning bunker outside Moscow. His shift began like any other but ended with Petrov literally saving the world from destruction. On that fateful day, Soviet early warning systems mistook reflected sunlight for five inbound American nuclear missiles. Soviet military doctrine required the watch officer to relay launch reports to his superiors, who in turn communicated with the Soviet General Staff. On his own initiative, Stanislav decided not to inform his superiors as he knew the United States would not start a world war with such a strategically insignificant first strike. He kept the information at his level, the moment passed, and the world was saved.

Let us consider for a moment an alternative scenario. The Soviet Union utilizes an artificial intelligence (AI) platform with faster than human reaction and decision speed as part of their early warning system. The AI platform receives the same false report but concludes the information is factual and relays the information to the Soviet General Staff. The Soviet General Staff is too far removed from the early warning system’s daily activities to recognize the error. The USSR responds with the full fury of its nuclear arsenal. American and NATO early warning systems detect a massive Soviet missile launch. Following established war plans, the West responds with a nuclear counterstrike. Human life as we know it ceases to exist.

NVIDIA CEO Jensen Huang says Elon Musk 'is working on exactly the right things'


Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang has given Elon Musk a glowing endorsement for his contributions to the field of artificial intelligence. Speaking at CES, Huang highlighted Musk’s advancements across various AI-driven areas, including cognitive intelligence, autonomous driving, and robotics.

According to Huang, Musk’s multi-faceted approach is setting the stage for transformative developments in the tech world.

A strategic edge in real world data

Huang emphasised Musk’s unique position, attributing much of his success to Tesla’s expansive ecosystem. Tesla’s AI-enabled factories, autonomous vehicle algorithms, and its vast fleet of cars provide Musk with unparalleled access to real-world data. This, Huang noted, is a significant advantage in refining and advancing AI technologies.

“He has just a phenomenal position, and he’s been working on this for a long time,” Huang said during an interview with Bloomberg TV. “And so he’s going to be in a great position to take advantage of it.”

DoD's Digital Future

Gregory T. Kiley

On December 19th, 2024, a ribbon cutting event was held for the opening of a new commercial digital engineering facility at Wright-Patterson Air Force Base. While extremely significant to the Department of Defense (DoD) and to the entire DoD ecosystem, (with the exception two publications) it was mainly ignored by the mainstream defense media. Given the amount of press and pressure put on the struggling F-35 Joint Strike Fighter (JSF) acquisition program, one would have expected such a positive development to garner more recognition. Despite a bipartisan embrace of digital engineering methods and methodology on Capitol Hill and in Washington, D.C., more needs to be done and vigilance needs to be maintained in DoD oversight. Now more than ever, taxpayers deserve a 21st century DoD Smart Buyer, educated in the ways of digital engineering.

The ribbon cutting of the JSF-funded Digital Electronic Systems Engineering/Hardware Accurate Digital Twinning Emulation and Design Center is a significant step in correcting one of the major consequences of 1990’s DoD Acquisition Reform – the decimation of the DoD Smart Buyer. Our country won the Cold War because of a strong partnership between the DoD engineering centers and the robust Defense Industrial Base technical staff. The DoD engineering centers developed challenging, technically confirmed requirements, and staff members from those centers served as the “Smart Buyer” when evaluating the Defense Industrial base proposals especially when providing technical and engineering management and support to the acquisition programs. Holding these acquisition programs to military standards, these Smart Buyers helped ensure that the developed system was affordable to operate and sustain.