Kerry Chávez , Ori Swed
We urge the militaries of the United States and other democratic states to prepare to both counter drones and harness them during future conflict.
The Russia-Ukraine and Gaza wars have illustrated that simple drones are no longer a nuisance from terrorists that can be ignored or even easily countered. It has become a weapon of choice for standing armies, with Ukraine, Russia, and Israel extensively incorporating tactical drones into their military arsenals. Because international security challenges are increasing in quantity—stemming from more, diverse actors operating from the gray zone to total war—and modern warfare is changing in quality—becoming more transparent, lethal, fast-paced, and multi-domain—more states will emulate the use of tactical drones in Ukraine. We urge the militaries of the United States and other democratic nations to prepare to both counter drones and harness them during future conflict.
Yet what branch of service should take the lead in preparing the military to contend with these burgeoning challenges and opportunities? For operations in the air littoral, it has been hazy whether this should fall to air or land forces. Although many people associate unmanned aerial systems (UAS) with air forces, ground forces have been the most exposed to small drones and are the most likely to benefit from their use in battle theaters. Consequently, armies are currently the most incentivized and poised to develop atactical drone fleet that would neither replace nor compete with strategic models.
No comments:
Post a Comment