Globally, the past decade has been marked by the twin advances of authoritarianism and populism. The two are not always linked, but in situations ranging from the Philippines and Cambodia to Hungary and Poland, politicians have leveraged populist movements to seize power. Once in office, they have begun the process of dismantling the institutions designed to check their authority and protect human rights, particularly the judiciary and the media.
The populist boom is fueled by disparate, local issues, but these often share common features, such as feelings of disenfranchisement, of being left out of a global economic boom and of discomfort at seeing familiar social orders upended. The movements these grievances generate have spurred anti-immigrant xenophobia—and, in places like Hungary and Greece, even horrifying episodes of political violence—as underlying prejudices are exploited by opportunistic politicians.
Champions of liberal democracy have often appeared hamstrung in their attempts to counter these forces, but there have been some recent successes, including the rise of the Greens across Europe and electoral setbacks for extremist parties in France, Spain and the Netherlands. And in countries where centrist or right-wing parties have chosen to adopt populist policies rather than to push back against them, civil society groups have been resurgent.
The government of Greek Prime Minister Kyriakos Mitsotakis, whose right-wing New Democracy party won last summer’s elections in a landslide, has wasted little time adopting a new hard-line migration policy. Mitsotakis told Parliament in November that from now on, Greece would welcome “only those we choose.” The new approach to asylum-seekers is part and parcel of New Democracy’s self-described “law and order” agenda, aimed at “cleaning up” Greece and reinstating a sense of security, including through the use of force if necessary.
No comments:
Post a Comment