Pages
▼
22 July 2018
IMF cuts India's growth projections for 2018, 2019
Fear and loathing on the New Silk Road: Chinese security in Afghanistan and beyond
Angela Stanzel
China’s focus in Afghanistan is moving away from development projects and towards the containment of perceived security threats. Europeans do not yet fully understand China’s new approach, seen in its patrols of the Wakhan Corridor – in what it calls a “joint counter-terrorism operations” with Kabul – and other security initiatives involving Afghanistan. It remains unclear whether China’s Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) is still a purely development-focused operation, or whether there is a planned and profound long-term shift in Chinese security priorities. So far, Beijing’s most substantive engagement with Afghanistan has been in border control efforts designed to prevent terrorists from entering China. In addition, “a similar pattern has emerged in Central Asia: China is working to deepen its cooperation with countries in the region by largely concentrating on measures to combat terrorist groups and other threats. Although Beijing rarely speaks about expanding its security ties with other countries, these trends indicate that it could be developing a capacity to promote stability in the region.”
![](https://www.ecfr.eu/images/web/chinese_pakistani_border_guards.png)
Trade Troubles: China Is Poised to Bring Down the Global Economy
by Gordon G. Chang
![](https://nationalinterest.org/sites/default/files/styles/resize-1440/public/main_images/RTSJLSS.jpg?itok=iY9y3R1T)
The Trade War—What Is Not in the Price
Veteran financial traders often lament that their younger coworkers have never lived through a bear market. But it is fair to say that no one alive has experienced a trade war comparable to what the United States under President Donald Trump is starting. Before the tariffs now being imposed on a range of products from China, it was solar panels, washing machines, steel, and aluminum. What's next? We believe it is a foregone conclusion that the "national security" auto case will result in tariffs—likely against high-end cars from European and Japanese automakers—before the November midterm elections. Why? Peter Navarro and Robert Lighthizer, Trump's top trade advisers, believe they know what to do based on the U.S. experience in the "car wars" with Japan in the 1980s.
In China, Unweaving the Tangled Web of Local Debt
Source link
A slower economy, sluggish construction growth, weaker local government revenue and a sharp jump in maturing debt could boost the risk of default for some local government-related debt, particularly in the central and southwest regions.
![](https://www.stratfor.com/sites/default/files/styles/article_large/public/china-debt-display-GettyImages-928350194.jpg?itok=mTcYs_6N)
Despite previous announcements, Beijing may step in to assist or even bail out some loans if defaults accelerate. The urgency of the risk will compel the central government to accelerate efforts to revamp the country's tax structure, but its ability will be limited by the uncertain economic situation.
The devil’s bargain for AI companies working in China
American tech companies and research institutions — involved in the development of artificial intelligence in both the U.S. and China — face elevated ethical questions as the two superpowers race for dominance in the field. Why it matters: U.S. labs face the real possibility that collaborations with Chinese companies and universities will end up bolstering Beijing’s goal of dominating global civilian and military AI. What’s going on: China’s prestigious Tsinghua University recently laid out a vision for how it will develop AI for military applications, flagging a close relationship between universities, private companies, and the armed forces. In China, such collaborations are the default, but in the U.S., companies and institutions are still grappling with how willing they are to work with the military. Google recently withdrew from a Pentagon drone-surveillance program when some employees revolted.
The Relevance of Clausewitz and Kautilya in Counterinsurgency Operations
Debasis Dash
The concept of asymmetric warfare is neither new nor static and has been used over centuries as a means for an inferior force to counter a superior force. In nearly every century of recorded conflict, there have been events where various forms of asymmetric warfare were adopted by one set of belligerents as a means to enforce their goals on the target populace. Most familiar among them was insurgency, used as a strategy to challenge the government and its institutions.[1] However, the nature and complexity of an insurgency are such that they bind the levels of response by a counter-insurgent force to below conventional warfare and above low-intensity conflict. The period of engagement and intensity of the insurgency further escalates if it has the latent characteristics of a proxy war.[2] If the existence of an insurgency is within the national boundaries, the situation demands a level of military action while remaining within the sphere of law enforcement. The counterinsurgency operations led by coalition forces in Afghanistan and the engagement of Indian armed forces in Kashmir and elsewhere within India provide the context whereby we might better understand various facets of an insurgency and be able to devise a more effective counter-response strategy. This article will use those contexts to analyze the lessons provided by Kautilya and Carl von Clausewitz toward understanding modern-day counterinsurgency operations.
Islamist Actors: Libya and Tunisia
By Lisa Watanabe for Center for Security Studies (CSS)
![](https://www.ethz.ch/content/dam/ethz/special-interest/gess/cis/center-for-securities-studies/resources/covers/Tunisia-Libya.png)
Israel’s Active Defense Campaign in Syria: The Next Phase
By Yaakov Lappin
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: Tehran’s recent decision to attempt direct clashes with Israel resulted in a resounding defeat on May 10, when the IDF destroyed 50 Iranian military targets in Syrian territory. Iran is now shifting gears back to its traditional proxy approach. While it appears reluctant to mobilize Hezbollah against Israel right now and risk a full-scale regional war, it is continuing to work on securing a military position in Syria to use for future aggression. Israel must maintain its flexibility and responsiveness in order to prevent the creation of a second Iranian mass missile front on the border. Judging from international media reports, Israel’s campaign to keep Iran out of Syria has entered a new phase.
RUSSIA'S MILITARY POSTURE: GROUND FORCES ORDER OF BATTLE
Catherine Harris, Russia and Ukraine Research Analyst at ISW
Frederick W. Kagan, Critical Threats Project Director at the American Enterprise Institute
Joint Force Quarterly (JFQ)
o Intelligence in a Data-Driven Age
o Strategic Shaping: Expanding the Competitive Space
o The Future of the Aircraft Carrier and the Carrier Air Wing
o 568 Balls in the Air: Planning for the Loss of Space Capabilities
o Transregional Capstone Exercise: Training for Tomorrow’s Fight
o The Case for Joint Force Acquisition Reform
o U.S. Special Operations Command’s Future, by Design
o Enhancing Global Security Through Security Force Assistance
o Cooking Shows, Corollas, and Innovation on a Budget '
o Bombs, Not Broadcasts: U.S. Preference for Kinetic Strategy in Asymmetric Conflict
o Reverse Engineering Goldwater-Nichols: China’s Joint Force Reforms
o Don’t Shoot the Messenger: Demosthenes, Churchill, and the Consensus Delusion
o Defending the AEF: Combat Adaptation and Jointness in the Skies over France
o The U.S. Government’s Approach to Economic Security
Military ReviewJuly-August 2018,
o The 75th Ranger Regiment Military Intelligence Battalion Modernizing for Multi-Domain Battle
o Developing a Light Infantry-Robotic Company as a System
o Reconnaissance beyond the Coordinated Fire Line Division Warfighter Trends
o The Suwalki Gap A Proving Ground for Cluster Munitions
o A Central Asian Perspective on Russian Soft Power The View from Tashkent
o The Decades-Long “Double-Double Game” Pakistan, the United States, and the Taliban
o Many Voices Telling One Story Public Affairs Operations across Africa in Support of Combatant Commanders
o Preparing Security Force Assistance Brigades for the Complexity of Human Interaction
o Lebanese Armed Forces Implementing Instruments of National Power as Lines of Effort to Engage a Palestinian Refugee Camp
o Mexico’s Fight against Transnational Organized Crime
o China-Latin America Arms Sales Antagonizing the United States in the Western Hemisphere?
Why Trump Is Getting Away With Foreign-Policy Insanity
BY STEPHEN M. WALT
![](https://foreignpolicymag.files.wordpress.com/2018/07/walt_gettyimages-1000191638.jpg?w=1536&h=1024&crop=0,0,0,0)
Trump’s ‘America First’ Policy Could Leave U.S. Defense Industry Behind
BY LARA SELIGMAN
![](https://foreignpolicymag.files.wordpress.com/2018/07/gettyimages-9969461441.jpg?w=1500&h=1000&crop=0,0,0,0)
Closing the Factory Doors
BY CHRISTINA LARSON
![](https://foreignpolicymag.files.wordpress.com/2018/06/fp_futurework_larson_revisea_sw_v1-2.jpg?w=1536&h=1024&crop=0,0,0,0)
U.S., Russia: What to Make of the Trump-Putin Summit in Helsinki
Source Link
U.S. President Donald Trump met with Russian President Vladimir Putin in Helsinki on July 16. The meeting was the first official summit between the two leaders and included a one-on-one session as well as a group-level discussion with senior Cabinet officials from both sides. As Stratfor stated in the 2018 Third-Quarter Forecast, Russia will attempt to break a negotiating stalemate with the United States to talk sanctions, military build-ups and arms control. Moscow will likely promote its ability to mediate in the Syrian conflict, but as we previously stated: Don't hold your breath for a breakthrough. As Stratfor anticipated, no major agreements came out of the summit, though some of the key topics of discussion were highlighted in a joint press conference following the meeting.
![](https://www.stratfor.com/sites/default/files/styles/article_large/public/donal-trump-vladimir-putin-summit.jpg?itok=rrKyz4Ev)
Addressing Nuclear Arms Control
Europe Should Call Trump’s Bluff
BY GARVAN WALSHE
![](https://foreignpolicymag.files.wordpress.com/2018/07/natosummit.jpg?w=1500&h=1000&crop=0,0,0,0)
Robert Mueller Is Fighting a War
BY MARK GALEOTTI
![](https://foreignpolicymag.files.wordpress.com/2018/07/gettyimages-81708297.jpg?w=1536&h=1024&crop=0,0,0,0)
The Thai Cave Rescue: What Are the Leadership Lessons?
Why the U.K. Has Few Options in the Brexit Negotiations
'It Was a Miracle!' Thai Soccer Players Relive Daring Rescue from Flooded Cave
George Thomas
Here’s how much a new artificial intelligence center could cost
![](https://www.armytimes.com/resizer/wFzOBsiRArfsqJXGKDcGeDtG2ns=/1200x0/filters:quality(100)/arc-anglerfish-arc2-prod-mco.s3.amazonaws.com/public/OLVXPOUZQJFMLMBEG5YALRJHI4.jpg)
Chinese Espionage Group TEMP.Periscope Targets Cambodia Ahead of July 2018 Elections and Reveals Broad Operations Globally
by Scott Henderson, Steve Miller, Dan Perez, Marcin Siedlarz, Ben Wilson, Ben Read
Introduction
FireEye has examined a range of TEMP.Periscope activity revealing extensive interest in Cambodia's politics, with active compromises of multiple Cambodian entities related to the country’s electoral system. This includes compromises of Cambodian government entities charged with overseeing the elections, as well as the targeting of opposition figures. This campaign occurs in the run up to the country’s July 29, 2018, general elections. TEMP.Periscope used the same infrastructure for a range of activity against other more traditional targets, including the defense industrial base in the United States and a chemical company based in Europe. Our previous blog post focused on the group’s targeting of engineering and maritime entities in the United States.
HOW CONSERVATION BECAME COLONIALISM
BY ALEXANDER ZAITCHIK
![](https://foreignpolicymag.files.wordpress.com/2018/07/zaitchik_1.jpg)
China military MILITARY REFORM Welcome to the modern military: China’s new combat units prepare for electronic warfare
Minnie Chan
Why cyber space matters as much to Nato as land, sea and air defence
Please use the sharing tools found via the email icon at the top of articles. Copying articles to share with others is a breach of FT.com T&Cs and Copyright Policy. Email licensing@ft.com to buy additional rights. Subscribers may share up to 10 or 20 articles per month using the gift article service. More information can be found here. Jens Stoltenberg on Article 5 and why cyber defence has become core to the alliance Cyber attacks can switch off city power supplies © Max Vetrov/AFP/Getty Images Share on Twitter (opens new window) Share on Facebook (opens new window) Share on LinkedIn (opens new window) Save Save to myFT Jens Stoltenberg JULY 12, 2018 Print this page2 One night, just before Christmas in 2015, the power went out across Kiev. As apartments rapidly chilled in the sub-zero temperatures and water pipes began to freeze, Ukrainian engineers raced to turn the power back on. A year later, exactly the same thing happened again.
Having a vision to tackle the hackers
By Andy Stout
![](https://d3dh6of9cnaq4t.cloudfront.net/Pictures/480xany/6/1/2/5612_orangeisthenewblackseason5sourcenetflix_770914.jpg)
Opinion: We need to decide what constitutes an ‘act of war’ in the digital age
BY ALEX HOLLINGS
![](https://sofrep.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/AP_18161276267018-905x541.jpg)
An Assessment of the Likely Roles of Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning Systems in the Near Future
Ali Crawford has an M.A. from the Patterson School of Diplomacy and International Commerce where she focused on diplomacy, intelligence, cyber policy, and cyber warfare. She tweets at @ali_craw. Divergent Options’ content does not contain information of an official nature nor does the content represent the official position of any government, any organization, or any group. Title: An Assessment of the Likely Roles of Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning Systems in the Near Future Summary: While the U.S. Department of Defense (DoD) continues to experiment with Artificial Intelligence (AI) as part of its Third Offset Strategy, questions regarding levels of human participation, ethics, and legality remain. Though a battlefield in the future will likely see autonomous decision-making technology as a norm, the transition between modern applications of artificial intelligence and potential applications will focus on incorporating human-machine teaming into existing frameworks.
When Drones Attack: The Threat Remains Limited
By Scott Stewart
![](https://www.stratfor.com/sites/default/files/styles/article_large/public/drone-flying.jpg?itok=qzZFIQ4L)
The Big Picture