By Matthew Cox
![](https://images01.military.com/sites/default/files/styles/full/public/2018-02/eagledrone1800x1200.jpg?itok=NIP1GKE-)
"There is value to having an unmanned aerial system teamed with a manned system, especially when you are operating over places like Sadr City where you get shot at a lot and it is much easier to put an unmanned aerial system over that and use the weapon systems on a manned aircraft to work together to engage targets," he said.
The Army is also interested in teaming unmanned systems with other unmanned platforms, McConville said.
"I can even see us with unmanned-unmanned systems teaming in the future ... an unmanned vehicle could deliver smaller unmanned aerial systems that would be in a place to penetrate or reduce an integrated air defense," McConville said.
But as useful as unmanned technology is, "it's not a panacea," McConville said.
"You still need soldiers on the battlefield; drones don't smell, they don't feel," he said. "If you are watching me here on video, you don't get the same feeling as if you are in the crowd, and it's the same thing in combat."
Observing action on a live video feed from inside a tactical operations center is "not the same as actually being there," he said. "When you are working with unmanned systems, you've got to be careful that you don't believe that you know everything that is going on, that is where the danger is on the unmanned side of the house."
-- Matthew Cox can be reached at matthew.cox@military.com.
No comments:
Post a Comment