By: Armin Haracic
![](https://www.armytimes.com/resizer/Oc16r7eKV5pJ8pc7b-lx9zPUL-4=/1200x0/filters:quality(100)/arc-anglerfish-arc2-prod-mco.s3.amazonaws.com/public/NVJV6OJIH5C33ODX3TDPYCAKQM.jpg)
The FBI had subsequently hacked 8,000 computers in 120 countries, including Russia, China and Iran, which have been known for antagonistic relationships with the U.S. over computer hacking.
However, the Daily Beast indicates that when the FBI deploys malware or hacks into a foreign computer, all that the target may see “is a piece of suspicious software connecting to a U.S. government facility ― something that could easily ring alarm bells.” This in turn could lead to a foreign country issuing arrest warrants for those involved in a hack, as Russia did in 2002 when the FBI hacked a Russian server that was involved in a cybercrime spree.
Even in cases involving crimes such as child pornography, without properly articulated norms and procedures between international bodies, particularly ones in tension with the U.S., such hacking operations could lead to lack of cooperation, if not downright antagonism in the cases.
Cybersecurity researcher Collin Anderson solidified this idea by saying that “the true risk is how the FBI’s procedures and communications about their use of malware creates international norms that are adopted by countries where rule of law is weak.”
No comments:
Post a Comment