3.5 MB
0.1 MB
Technical Details »
Research Questions
Does the Army have standardized performance metrics for ASPs?
Are there baselines for common ASP processes?
How can ASPs perform more efficiently?
Can methods be developed by which to measure ASP performance?
The U.S. Army Materiel Command (AMC) asked RAND Arroyo Center to analyze the U.S. Army's training ammunition supply chain to determine where efficiencies leading to cost reductions could be realized while maintaining or improving service levels. The project targeted a goal of achieving a more efficient supply chain for CONUS-based training ammunition with an eye toward meeting the Army's requirements for operational preparedness in light of current fiscal constraints. The study reviewed the generation of ammunition requirements, stockpile management processes, and policies and practices at CONUS-based Ammunition Supply Points (ASPs) and Installation Ammunition Management Offices. To supplement existing information, the research team surveyed ASP personnel and interviewed various stakeholders. Because the Army does not have a standard set of metrics by which to oversee or govern operations across the ammunition enterprise, the project developed the RAND ASP Benchmarking Tool. This tool and the data collection used to populate it allowed the research team to compare ten sample ASPs across dimensions that included cost, performance, tasks lists, and resources. Additionally, the researchers conducted an in-depth case study of the ASP at Fort Hood, Texas, and examined the management of training ammunition in the U.S. Marine Corps, in order to draw other insights and identify best practices.
Key Findings
Because enterprise metrics for ASP operations do not exist, RAND developed the RAND ASP Benchmarking Tool, which is capable of establishing performance baselines across ASPs. The tool uses data pulled from numerous sources and separates those data into structural- and activity-related characteristics of individual ASPs. It could also be used for trend analysis at one or more ASPs to assess performance over time.
A case study of the Fort Hood ASP identified a number of innovative methods for tackling munitions management--related challenges and demonstrated use of the Benchmarking Tool.
Forecasting of ammunition needed to support training requirements can never be exact; however, deficient procedures are leading to increased, unpredicted workload at ASPs.
ASPs and the installations on which they reside tend to vary in how they operate across the following areas: operating procedures and safety; training and interface with customer units drawing ammunition; human capital management and equipment; and budgeting procedures. These variations significantly hamper the enterprise-level tracking of cost reductions.
A number of USMC practices in training ammunition operations — for example, USMC's treatment of brass and residue following a unit's training event and several of its online automated information systems and publications — provide potentially significant areas in which the Army could gain efficiencies.
Recommendations
Develop standardized metrics and critical information requirements for the ammunition community.
Provide guidance and support to improve unit-level forecasting of ammunition required for training.
Provide training to unit personnel who draw ammunition and hold them accountable for procedural discrepancies.
Develop standard operating procedures (SOPs).
Standardize the rules of allocation for personnel and equipment assigned to Ammunition Supply Points (ASPs) and Installation Ammunition Management Offices (IAMOs).
Establish clearly defined position descriptions for ASP personnel and IAMOs.
Seek improved methods for employing active and reserve duty ammunition soldiers.
Address safety shortfalls.
Improve knowledge sharing across the ammunition community.
Investigate the potential for continuous inventory control to enhance inventory accountability.
Consider reducing the residue and reconciliation burden on the ASPs.
Table of Contents
Chapter One
Introduction and Methodology
Chapter Two
RAND Ammunition Supply Point Benchmarking Tool
Chapter Three
Case Study of the United States Marine Corps
Chapter Four
Findings, Recommendations, and Directions for Future Research
Appendix A
Recommendations Within the Ammunition Supply Chain Models and DOTMLPF Framework
Appendix B
Design Structure and Data Fields of the RAND Ammunition Supply Point Benchmarking Tool
Appendix C
Identifying Efficiencies in the Supply Chain for Training Ammunition Case Study — Fort Hood
Appendix D
RAND Ammunition Supply Point Survey
No comments:
Post a Comment