BY THE DATA TEAM
Sep 23rd 2015
The attack may mark a notable turn of events in the region: while Pakistan’s complicity in the American covert strikes is no secret, this incident could indicate the start of a more active part in Pakistan's battle against the Taliban and al-Qaeda. But whether indigenous drones will boost the country’s counter-terrorism capabilities remains to be seen.
One reason why it so difficult to judge the drones' success is a lack of data. Since all but one of the strikes in Pakistan were executed under the aegis of the CIA, information is classified. The US government does not publish data on drone sorties, strikes and casualties caused. However, various organisations, such as the Bureau of Investigative Journalism, the Long War Journal and the New America Foundation, have taken to tracking the strikes themselves by analysing media reports—with varying results. It is a tall order: definitions are shaky (what, for example, makes a militant?), and sources may be biased. The remoteness of the tribal areas does not make for easy counting either, with reports of strikes often incomplete or contradictory.
Without comprehensive data to draw on, some experts speculate that the heavy bombardment of North Waziristan has merely caused terrorists to relocate. Others—most notably former US President Jimmy Carter—have said that drone attacks, in fact, only create more terrorists.
No comments:
Post a Comment