07 February 2014
There was also a consensus that there is a certain level of dichotomy involved in issues related to water. The populist sentiment on the treaties is that they are flawed. However, it can be argued that they are fundamentally and intrinsically strong, according to the panellists.
Mr. Gyawali, now with the Nepal Water Conservation Foundation, pointed out an extremely significant fact that issues within countries override issues between countries in South Asia. He said the real problem lies in the proclivities of civil society and business leaders.
He suggested that discussions on water go one step further into the realm of marginalised rivers as they hold more importance for the people and it is easier to move up from there in negotiations.
Mr. Uttam Kumar Sinha of the Institute of Defence and Security Analysis furthered Mr. Gyawali’s points by focusing more on the need to understand the political, sociological and legal aspects of water in order to frame a cooperative environment in the future.
Mr. Sinha said that there is a learning curve attached to the study of water that is showing an upward trend. He advanced the idea that South Asia is deeply hydrologically connected and there is a pressing need to bring in new knowledge and an inter-disciplinary approach. This would further fuel the learning curve and make it move upwards, he said.
(This report is prepared by Pooja Suri, Research Intern, Observer Research Foundation, Delhi)
No comments:
Post a Comment