Director of Pentagon’s secretive Strategic Capabilities Office lays out focus areas

DefenseScoop  |  Jon Harper

Pentagon’s Strategic Capabilities Office (SCO) Director Jay Dryer recently detailed the organization's focus areas, operating with a $1.7 billion budget this year to rapidly prototype and transition "game-changing" high-tech solutions for near-term challenges. The SCO collaborates with combatant commands and military services, prioritizing warfighter needs across air, land, sea, space, and cyber domains. Its three portfolios include long-range fires (kinetic systems), autonomy and AI (human decision-making, command-and-control), and "special and enabling capabilities" (cyber, electronic warfare, space, special operations forces). Eight key focus areas aim to enable "blue kill chains" and disrupt "red kill chains," encompassing precision fires, contested logistics, novel employment, deception, advanced kill webs, countering adversary kill chains, extended reach, survivability, and cost-effective air defense. Projects like Ghost Fleet USVs and the Pele nuclear power plant exemplify its work, emphasizing industry partnerships.

Read Full Article →

America Built Taiwan's Chip Industry. Now Washington Is Using It as a Weapon Against Taiwan

FrameTheGlobeNews  |  The Ren Way

The United States is leveraging Taiwan's semiconductor industry as a strategic weapon against the island nation, despite having played a foundational role in its development. Former President Trump's assertion that Taiwan "stole" America's semiconductor industry underpins a demand for its relocation, a claim the article labels as false. Washington is reportedly enforcing this relocation demand by withholding weapons packages that the U.S. Congress had already approved for Taiwan. This policy creates significant tension in the U.S.-Taiwan relationship, potentially undermining Taiwan's economic sovereignty and its defense capabilities against external threats. The strategic implications extend to global supply chains and the geopolitical balance in the Indo-Pacific, particularly concerning China's ambitions. The article highlights a complex interplay of economic leverage and security assistance, raising questions about the long-term stability of U.S. commitments to its allies.

Read Full Article →

AI and the Future of Work

Special Competitive Studies Project  |  Mike Rounds, Mark Warner, Chris Malachowsky, Ylli Bajraktari

The Special Competitive Studies Project's Task Force on AI and the Future of Work identifies artificial intelligence as a general-purpose technology rapidly reshaping the American economy and workforce. AI's unprecedented speed and scope, diffusing twice as fast as the internet, are creating both productivity gains and significant pressures, particularly on entry-level roles. The report emphasizes that AI's impact is concentrated at the task level, necessitating a fundamental reconfiguration of roles and a shift in required skills, including digital capabilities and durable human attributes like critical thinking. Traditional educational pathways are deemed insufficient to meet these evolving demands. The Task Force advocates for proactive, coordinated national action across government, industry, and academia to ensure AI augments workers rather than displaces them, fostering broad economic opportunity and sustaining U.S. leadership in AI innovation. Without timely policy choices and investment in workforce development, the benefits of AI could become concentrated, exacerbating existing economic disparities.

Read Full Article →

From Hedgerows to Kill Webs: The Soldier Leads Army Transformation - Modern War Institute

Modern War Institute  |  James Mingus, Dwayne Steppe

The US Army's transformation is primarily driven by individual soldiers and squads, not headquarters or acquisition bureaucracies, a principle exemplified by Sergeant Curtis G. Culin III's hedgerow plow in 1944. This bottom-up innovation is evident in recent changes, such as the transition to the more compact M7 carbine based on urban combat feedback, the development of lighter Load-bearing Soldier Armor Protection Initiative plates, and the introduction of the Infantry Squad Vehicle (ISV) to reduce maintenance and enhance mobility. Underpinning these advancements is an investment in Holistic Health and Fitness, ensuring soldiers are physically and mentally prepared. While advanced sensors, unmanned systems, and networked fires are crucial enablers, they do not substitute for the disciplined soldier's mastery of fundamentals. A culture where soldiers at every echelon believe they own the Army's future accelerates transformation, fostering excellence and ensuring the institution remains adaptable and lethal in future conflicts.

Read Full Article →

Leaked Russian Documents Reveal Growing Strain Inside Russia’s Economy

Unmasking Russia  |  Olga Lautman

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy revealed on May 18, 2026, that Ukrainian intelligence obtained internal Russian documents exposing significant economic strain across Russia's oil sector, banking system, federal budget, and industrial base. The documents detail efforts to bypass sanctions, attract foreign investment, and involve outside companies in sustaining Russia’s wartime economy. One Russian oil company alone shut down approximately 400 oil wells, contributing to a projected 10% decline in Russian oil refining this year and an anticipated fourth consecutive year of overall oil production decline in 2026, reaching a 17-year low. Major energy companies like Rosneft, Gazprom Neft, and Lukoil report substantial profit reductions or losses. Eleven Russian financial institutions are preparing for liquidation, with eight others requiring external support, and the federal budget deficit approached $80 billion within five months. The defense industrial sector, exemplified by Angstrem's near-collapse under $2.5 billion debt, also faces severe strain. Russia is actively using foreign companies, including those connected to the United States, to evade sanctions, facilitate stolen grain exports from occupied Crimea, and funnel investment into Arctic oil and gas projects.

Read Full Article →

Russian nuclear weapons, 2026

Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists  |  Hans M. Kristensen, Matt Korda, Eliana Johns, Mackenzie Knight-Boyle

Russia's nuclear modernization program, despite being in its late stages, is experiencing significant delays and technical challenges, impacting the deployment of newer systems. As of March 2026, Russia possesses an estimated 4,400 nuclear warheads for strategic and non-strategic forces, a slight increase from the previous year, with approximately 1,796 strategic warheads deployed. This modernization is driven by a desire for parity with the United States, national prestige, and to offset perceived conventional force inferiority and US missile defense threats. The recent successful test of the Sarmat ICBM on May 12, 2026, follows years of setbacks. Russia's use of dual-capable precision weapons in Ukraine, some de-nuclearized, raises concerns about its nuclear strategy and intentions, contributing to increased defense spending and nuclear modernization efforts in other nations. The expiration of the New START treaty in February 2026, and the US rejection of Russia's offer to voluntarily adhere to its limits, significantly reduces transparency regarding Russia's nuclear force structure, making future open-source estimations more challenging.

Read Full Article →

Ukraine’s AI Gambit Shows Middle Powers How to Play a Weak Hand

Lawfare | Jake Steckler, Sam Winter-Levy

Ukraine's Minister of Defense, Mykhailo Fedorov, announced on March 12 that the Ukrainian military would share millions of drone videos and battlefield data with Ukrainian companies and allied nations to train artificial intelligence (AI) models. This initiative aims to accelerate Ukraine's autonomous drone development and deliver new capabilities, outperforming Russia in technological cycles. The strategy positions Ukraine as a "middle power" leveraging unique assets—a rapidly iterating domestic drone manufacturing ecosystem and high-quality, continuously refreshed combat data—in a global AI race dominated by the United States and China. Ukraine's data, annotated by operators and reflecting high-intensity conventional warfare, addresses a deficit in specialized military data for U.S. AI development. By structuring data access to prevent one-time transactions and ensure continuous engagement, Kyiv creates dependencies that raise the cost for partners to disengage, securing access to advanced AI capabilities in return. This approach offers a model for other middle powers to find indispensable niches in the AI supply chain.

Read Full Article →

Empires of Flow Control

The New York Review of Books | Nicholas Mulder

The Strait of Hormuz, a critical global maritime chokepoint, has been effectively closed by Iran since late February using its drone and missile arsenal in response to the US–Israeli war, while the US under Trump imposed its own blockade on Iran since mid-April. This conflict highlights the concept of "flow control," where states manipulate crucial transit points to regulate and profit from trade, rather than completely block it. Iran, for instance, demanded a toll payment of about $1 per barrel of oil for passage through Hormuz as of early April. This situation exposes the vulnerability of populous, fast-growing economies in South, Southeast, and East Asia, including India, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Malaysia, the Philippines, Vietnam, and China, which are heavily reliant on Gulf energy imports. Many of these Asian states have already made arrangements with Iran to secure access, prioritizing energy over adherence to "freedom of navigation" principles. This emerging post-American network of global trade, with its own internal balance of power, reflects historical traditions of Eurasian economic exchange and the re-evaluation of maritime control doctrines.

Read Full Article →

Intelligence Officer Training For Network-Centered Warfare In Ukraine And The United States

Line of Departure  |  Anton Maksymov

The Russo-Ukrainian War has profoundly reshaped military intelligence (MI) training requirements, exposing the critical inadequacy of analog methods in a transparent, network-centric battlespace. Major Anton Maksymov, a Ukrainian Army intelligence chief, highlights how the conflict, characterized by widespread use of reconnaissance and strike unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs), Starlink satellite internet terminals, and artificial intelligence (AI), necessitates a radical shift from traditional training based on past conflicts like Iraq and Afghanistan. Ukrainian soldiers, despite training abroad, found themselves unprepared for the real-time digital intelligence demands of modern warfare. To address this, MI training must transition to unified digital battlespace management systems, incorporate updated enemy doctrine and tactics, prepare officers for persistent surveillance and precision strikes, and integrate AI tools for rapid data processing and enhanced decision-making. This continuous adaptation is crucial for any military force aiming to win the "first battle" of future conflicts.

Read Full Article →

The Andes hantavirus ship outbreak: Lessons from a dress rehearsal

Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists  |  Georgios Pappas

A hypothetical hantavirus outbreak on the MV Hondius cruise ship, originating from an ornithologist in the South American wilderness, serves as a critical "dress rehearsal" for future pandemics. This Andes virus strain, characterized by a high mortality rate (three deaths among 10 confirmed infections), demonstrated limited person-to-person transmission, unlike SARS-CoV-2. However, the incident exposed significant strategic vulnerabilities in global health security, particularly the delayed international response. Passengers disembarked and traveled worldwide before the World Health Organization (WHO) initiated evacuations, leading to potential global dispersal of the highly lethal virus. While the virus's protracted incubation period slows epidemic evolution, it simultaneously complicates containment and necessitates challenging, extended quarantines. This scenario underscores the urgent need for improved rapid global health coordination, robust surveillance, and effective international protocols to manage emerging infectious diseases, even those with lower transmissibility, to prevent widespread disruption and fatalities.

Read Full Article →

Defense Primer: Hypersonic Boost-Glide Weapons – Analysis

Eurasia Review  |  Kelley M. Sayler

The U.S. Department of Defense (DOD) is actively developing hypersonic boost-glide weapons, which are maneuverable vehicles launched by rocket boosters, distinct from traditional ballistic missiles due to their ability to change course and follow depressed trajectories. Despite a reduced FY2026 budget request, the DOD views these systems as crucial for prompt, accurate strikes against priority targets, capable of evading advanced air and missile defenses. Concurrently, the U.S. expresses significant concern over advancements by Russia and China in this domain. Russia has deployed the nuclear-armed Avangard HGV on SS-19 missiles, designed to penetrate U.S. ballistic missile defenses, while China has operationalized the DF-17 medium-range HGV and is developing a nuclear-capable HGV for the DF-41 ICBM, including a fractional orbital bombardment system (FOBS) variant to evade northern early warning. Analysts debate whether this constitutes an "arms race" and if these weapons are truly "game-changing," given existing ballistic missile threats. The technology raises concerns about crisis instability, potentially incentivizing first strikes due to short flight times. The U.S. is also pursuing defensive systems like Golden Dome, though their feasibility and cost are debated, alongside potential arms control mechanisms.

Read Full Article →

The future of war arrived. We aren’t ready.

DefenseScoop | Rear Adm. (Ret.) Lorin Selby

The United States military's operational plans (OPLANs, CONPLANs) are largely obsolete, built on assumptions from five to ten years ago that fail to account for the rapid evolution of warfare driven by autonomous systems and artificial intelligence. Ukraine's conflict demonstrated compressed kill chains, the vulnerability of million-dollar platforms to cheap FPV drones, and the critical role of electronic warfare, rendering fixed assets and predictable basing liabilities. Companies like Anduril, Palantir, and Shield AI are now providing AI-enabled logistics, autonomous ISR, and software-defined weapons that reshape battlefields faster than current plans can adapt. The author, a former Chief of Naval Research, argues that institutional resistance, slow acquisition timelines, and risk aversion prevent the necessary transformation. Meaningful change requires rewriting plans from first principles, shifting significant funding from legacy programs to autonomous capabilities, updating doctrine (e.g., Air Force's Agile Combat Employment, Army's excavation methods), and empowering new leadership trained in the realities of modern, distributed warfare. The institution must adapt or face obsolescence in future conflicts.

Read Full Article →

Rethinking Survivability

Line of Departure  |  Jonathan Taylor

The proliferation of unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) in the Russia-Ukraine War necessitates a fundamental reevaluation of traditional military survivability operations, particularly for U.S. Army engineers. Conventional survivability measures, primarily focused on side cover against artillery fragmentation, are proving inadequate and sometimes counterproductive against the pervasive aerial reconnaissance and precision strike capabilities of modern UAVs. The article highlights that UAVs are responsible for 60-70% of damaged or destroyed Russian systems, emphasizing the critical need for overhead protection. Engineers must adapt by incorporating anti-UAV overhead cover, which can be less resource-intensive than anti-artillery solutions, and by critically weighing concealment versus cover based on the specific operational context and prevalent threats. Disturbing earth with heavy equipment for traditional dug-in positions can inadvertently increase visibility from the air, making concealment paramount. While acknowledging that future conflicts may not perfectly mirror Ukraine, the insights gained underscore that UAVs are a permanent fixture, demanding tailored, context-specific survivability strategies that integrate both overhead protection and optimized concealment.

Read Full Article →

Designing AI Integration: A Process Based Approach

Line of Departure  |  Alex Noll, Richard A. McConnell

The U.S. Department of War (DoW) is actively exploring Artificial Intelligence (AI) integration into military workflows, exemplified by a Command and General Staff School (CGSS) platform test. This experiment utilized a commercial AI model, Claude, to assist a student group in an intelligence collection Practical Exercise (P.E.) by acting as a collaborative "thinking partner." The methodology involved designing specific AI "skills" like Synch-Matrix and Intel-Estimate, establishing clear project instructions, and implementing guardrails to ensure context, accuracy, and prevent hallucination. During execution, the AI processed 40 Master Scenario Event List (MSEL) injects, correlating information, assessing Priority Intelligence Requirements (PIRs), and evaluating Threat Course of Action (TCOA) probabilities. This allowed students to focus on critical thinking and debate the AI's outputs, fostering deeper understanding and analytical rigor. The results demonstrated AI's capability to produce comprehensive G2 assessment reports and multi-tabbed trackers, effectively shifting the analytical burden from data collection to judgment and decision-making, thereby enhancing military staff planning and intelligence processes.

Read Full Article →

The Quick and the Dead: How Adaptation in Contact Drives Military Advantage

Hudson Institute  |  Bryan Clark, Ian Crone, Dan Patt

Military forces gain significant advantage through rapid adaptation during direct engagement, a critical factor in modern warfare. This capability, termed "adaptation in contact," allows units to quickly adjust tactics, technology, and doctrine in response to evolving battlefield conditions and enemy actions. It emphasizes decentralized decision-making, agile logistics, and continuous learning cycles, moving beyond rigid pre-planned strategies to dynamic, real-time adjustments. This approach is vital for maintaining superiority against peer and near-peer adversaries, particularly in complex, contested environments where traditional advantages may be negated by technological parity or asymmetric threats. Nations investing in flexible command structures, modular equipment, and extensive training for improvisation will be better positioned to achieve operational success and strategic objectives. The ability to learn and evolve faster than an opponent directly correlates with survivability and effectiveness, making it a cornerstone of future military doctrine and a key determinant of military advantage in contemporary conflicts. This strategic imperative necessitates a cultural shift towards embracing uncertainty and fostering innovation at all levels of command.

Read Full Article →

Drone Warfare Is Breaking the Economics of the Tank

RealClearDefense  |  Michael Aaron Cody

Drone warfare is fundamentally altering battlefield economics, rendering expensive armored platforms like tanks increasingly obsolete. Drones costing $400-$1,000 are repeatedly destroying M1 Abrams tanks valued between $8-$10 million, creating a 1:1000 cost asymmetry. This reality is evident in Ukraine, where Russian FPV drones swarm armored vehicles, and the Royal United Services Institute found tactical drones account for 60-70% of damaged and destroyed Russian systems. The U.S. Marine Corps, under Commandant General David Berger, eliminated all 452 tanks from its inventory in 2020, replacing them with rockets and drones, a decision validated by the Ukraine conflict. Despite this, the U.S. Army continues Abrams modernization, increasing costs and deepening supply chain constraints without addressing the core economic imbalance. Institutional resistance, driven by procurement pipelines and career structures, hinders adaptation. Nations must prioritize scalable, consumable systems like drones over legacy platforms for effective defense modernization.

Read Full Article →

Unseen Perils of US Alignment: Safeguarding India’s Strategic Autonomy in a Fractured Global Order

Niti Shastra  |  Navroop Singh, Himja Parekh

India's strategic autonomy faces significant perils from its increasing alignment with the United States, particularly concerning energy security and economic stability in a fractured global order. The article argues that most Indian experts overlook Russia's role as a global commodity backbone and China's as a manufacturing hub, which together underwrote decades of low-inflationary global economics. The Ukraine war and the 2026 Iran conflict, exacerbated by US-Israeli actions and Strait of Hormuz disruptions, have shattered this consensus, exposing India's vulnerability to rising energy and input costs critical for its "Make in India" initiative. Washington is strategically leveraging these crises, deploying conditional waivers for Russian oil, sanctions, and trade deals to compel India into dependence on more expensive American LNG and arms, mirroring Europe's costly shift away from Russian gas. This broader US playbook aims to subordinate India's foreign policy, integrate it into American supply chains, and position it as a frontline node against China, ultimately eroding India's strategic independence and economic competitiveness. Refusal to comply risks tariffs and destabilization, while compliance means forfeiting strategic independence.

Read Full Article →

The Island-Chain Allies

The Wire China | Chris Horton

The Philippines and Japan are significantly deepening their defense cooperation, as evidenced by the Balikatan 2026 military exercises where Japanese troops for the first time sank a foreign naval vessel in Philippine waters. These exercises, held near northern Luzon and the Bashi Channel, involved 17,000 troops from seven nations, including the U.S., Australia, Canada, France, and New Zealand, with Japan's contingent swelling to 1,400. This enhanced interoperability and coordination among "First Island Chain" democracies—Japan, the Philippines, and Taiwan (which sent observers)—aims to deter an increasingly belligerent China, especially concerning a potential Taiwan contingency. Key developments include the 2024 trilateral summit between the U.S., Japan, and the Philippines, and the subsequent Reciprocal Access Agreement (RAA) and Acquisition and Cross-Servicing Agreement (ACSA) between Tokyo and Manila. These agreements establish a legal and logistical framework for mutual troop deployment and sustainment, transforming the northern Philippines and southwestern Japanese islands into a single, mutually supporting operational space. This "quasi-alliance structure" markedly shifts deterrence calculus by enabling coordinated action independent of immediate U.S. intervention, complicating PLA planning and widening the geographic scope of potential conflict.

Read Full Article →

Hellscape Defense in Taiwan: Would It Work?

Modern War Institute  |  Wes Hutto

Taiwan's proposed "hellscape" defense strategy, championed by Admiral Samuel Paparo, envisions saturating the Taiwan Strait with low-cost, uninhabited aerial and maritime systems to deter or attrit a Chinese invasion. Operationally, this multi-layered robotic defense would target invading forces from eighty kilometers out to the beaches, employing long-range drones, anti-ship missiles, sea mines, and short-range FPV drones at landing zones. However, the strategy faces significant political and organizational hurdles. Taiwan's military is unlikely to fundamentally retool its force structure from traditional "exquisite" capabilities (e.g., F-16s, submarines) to a massive drone arsenal, primarily due to sovereignty considerations and established military professionalism, unless US security guarantees are completely withdrawn. Furthermore, public confidence, essential for potential insurgency, is linked to perceived military capabilities, and a shift to a "hellscape" might erode this. Politically, the strategy requires broad public consensus and approval from Taiwan's civilian government, which is improbable given current political polarization and the societal implications of transforming the island into a "garrison state."

Read Full Article →

The Thucydides Trap, Xi Jinping, and America’s Strategic Blind Spot

LinkedIn  |  Ken Robinson

Chinese President Xi Jinping strategically invoked the "Thucydides Trap" during a summit with then-President Trump, signaling China's demand for recognition as a coequal civilization-state and warning against escalating confrontation. This deliberate act was not merely diplomatic theater but a profound message to the American national-security establishment, underscoring China's long-term strategic thinking, which operates on dynastic timelines rather than short-term political or economic cycles. Beijing demonstrated its capacity to absorb economic damage from tariffs and retaliate by restricting critical rare earth exports, asserting its status as a peer competitor capable of imposing reciprocal costs. Xi's subsequent pivot to conciliation represents strategic sequencing, a calibrated approach to diplomacy that applies pressure, absorbs friction, and then offers stability once leverage is established. The article highlights a fundamental misunderstanding in the West regarding China's structural, rather than emotional, interpretation of diplomacy, framing the competition as one rooted in strategic culture and the architecture of the 21st-century global order.

Read Full Article →

Why China Is Now a Peer Competitor to the United States in Cyberspace

Center for Strategic and International Studies  |  Nikita Shah

China has systematically evolved its cyber capabilities over the past 15 years, establishing itself as a peer competitor to the United States in cyberspace, surpassing other adversaries. Utilizing a "whole-of-society" approach, China demonstrates sophistication in targeting and persistence, deeply penetrating U.S. critical infrastructure and public sector systems, including the U.S. Treasury and military installations. Campaigns like Salt Typhoon and Volt Typhoon highlight advanced technical capabilities, potentially leveraging large language models for precise targeting and even developing scalable AI tooling superior to U.S. counterparts, such as a version of Mythos Preview. The scale of China's talent pipeline, cultivated through competitions, universities, and research institutes, feeds hundreds of thousands into state institutions like the MSS and PLA. This is amplified by a private sector compelled to supply zero-day vulnerabilities, creating an agile offensive cyber supply chain. China's stealthy tactics, including targeting edge devices, living-off-the-land techniques, cloud environment exploitation, and widespread use of covert networks, make attribution and defense challenging. Strategically, China's clear intent, anchored in plans like "Made in China 2025" and its 15th Five-Year Plan, contrasts with perceived U.S. strategic ambiguity. The article suggests the U.S. must seize the post-Trump Beijing visit window to reinvigorate its cyber strategy, reverse agency cuts, and publish an implementation plan to re-establish superiority, moving beyond failed deterrence models.

Read Full Article →

After Trump-Xi Summit, Taiwan Breathes a Sigh of Relief

The Diplomat  |  Brian Hioe

Taiwan breathed a sigh of relief following the May 13-15 summit between U.S. President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping, as initial fears of a "grand bargain" that would compromise Taiwan's security did not materialize. Prior to the summit, concerns were high that Trump might negotiate U.S. arms sales to Taiwan with Beijing, potentially violating the long-standing Six Assurances, or adopt a stance against Taiwanese independence. The Trump administration had notably stalled a $14 billion arms package for Taiwan, prompting bipartisan calls from U.S. senators for its approval. Additionally, there were apprehensions that Kuomintang (KMT) chair Cheng Li-wun's planned visit to the U.S. could lead to reduced American commitments to Taiwan. However, the summit concluded without any new deals announced regarding Taiwan, and the U.S. and Chinese readouts even diverged on the issue, indicating no explicit concessions. Despite the immediate relief, Taiwan remains awaiting Trump's approval of the delayed arms package, highlighting ongoing strategic uncertainties in cross-strait relations.

Read Full Article →

US shows Taiwan non-negotiable: analysts

Taipei Times

The White House's deliberate omission of Taiwan from its official summary of talks between US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping signals Washington's view that Taiwan is not a negotiable issue, according to analysts. During Trump's state visit to China, the two sides' summaries diverged sharply; China's Xinhua news agency emphasized Xi's warning that Taiwan is "the most important issue" and mishandling it could lead to "clashes and even conflicts," while the US summary focused on economic cooperation and Iran. This reflects differing messaging strategies and a fundamental "gap in interpretation" regarding the US' "one China" policy. While the US does not support Taiwanese independence, it maintains security cooperation and arms sales to prevent Taipei from negotiating under duress, a stance Beijing views as encouraging independence. Analysts suggest the US omission itself conveys non-negotiability, advising Taiwan to focus on long-term strategic value and shared interests with the US, remaining alert to subtle shifts despite policy reaffirmations. The summit highlighted Beijing's attempt to frame Taiwan as central to "constructive strategic stability," with experts noting "stability never equals peace, and silence never equals commitment."

Read Full Article →

PRC in International Organizations

U.S.-China Economic and Security Review Commission

The U.S.-China Economic and Security Review Commission's publication, "PRC Representation in International Organizations," meticulously identifies Chinese nationals holding top leadership positions across a wide array of international governmental organizations as of April 23, 2026. This comprehensive document details Chinese heads within UN Principal Organs, UN Funds and Programs, UN Specialized Agencies, other UN entities, international trade and financial institutions, and various other international bodies. The Commission undertakes this research to fulfill its legislative mandate, specifically to monitor and assess the national security implications of the bilateral trade and economic relationship between the United States and the People’s Republic of China. The ongoing tracking of China's increasing presence in global governance structures underscores a strategic concern regarding Beijing's expanding influence and its potential impact on international norms and decision-making processes. The data will be updated annually, reflecting the dynamic nature of this geopolitical development.

Read Full Article →

Why China Waits: Beijing Is Playing a Long Game on Taiwan

Foreign Affairs | Amanda Hsiao and Bonnie S. Glaser

China is pursuing a long-term strategy for unification with Taiwan, predicated on the belief that time and a shifting balance of power favor Beijing. Rather than an imminent military invasion, China seeks to compel Taiwan's capitulation at the lowest possible cost, leveraging its growing military and economic capabilities to deter U.S. intervention. Beijing perceives its rise and Western democratic dysfunction as reinforcing its position, despite internal economic challenges. It actively employs legal, economic, military, and diplomatic pressure, noting declining independence sentiment among Taiwan's youth and the increasing influence of pro-unification opposition parties like the Kuomintang (KMT). Furthermore, China assesses that U.S. commitments to Taiwan are eroding, citing ambivalent statements from figures like Donald Trump and concerns over semiconductor dependence. This patient approach aims to deepen Taiwan's economic and social integration through "integrated development" while continuously constraining Taipei's policy space, ultimately shaping conditions for unification on Beijing's terms without a costly conflict.

Read Full Article →

UFO documents released by Pentagon describe floating objects and flashes of light

BBC  |  Sakshi Venkatraman, Rebecka Pieder

The Pentagon recently declassified and released 161 documents concerning Unidentified Flying Objects (UFOs), now referred to as Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena (UAP), following a directive from US President Donald Trump. These files, spanning decades, detail reported sightings by both civilians and Apollo astronauts, including descriptions of inexplicable phenomena such as floating objects, flashes of light, and particles "sailing off in space." Notably, the release includes video clips from 2022 taken by the US military in Iraq, Syria, and the United Arab Emirates, showing "unresolved unidentified anomalous phenomenon," with one oval-shaped object flagged as a "possible missile." This move reflects a renewed public and congressional interest in extraterrestrial life and government transparency on the matter, with some lawmakers welcoming it as a "great start" while others dismiss it as a distraction from more pressing national issues.

Read Full Article →

What Makes Trump’s New Counterterrorism Strategy So Alarming

Foreign Policy |  Colin P. Clarke, Clara Broekaert

The Trump administration's recently unveiled counterterrorism strategy is deemed alarming due to critical omissions in its threat assessment. The most significant concern centers on the specific terrorist threats conspicuously absent from the official document. This strategic oversight implies a potential reorientation of U.S. counterterrorism priorities or a deliberate downplaying of certain dangers, which could have substantial implications for national security and global stability. Such a strategy risks leaving the United States and its international partners unprepared for evolving threats not explicitly acknowledged, potentially necessitating a re-evaluation of intelligence gathering, resource allocation, and operational focus. The perceived selective nature of the strategy's threat identification could also signal a broader doctrinal shift in the U.S. approach to combating terrorism, potentially impacting existing alliances and international cooperation frameworks that rely on a comprehensive understanding of the global threat landscape.

Read Full Article →

Can Corporate America Protect Democracy? In the Trump Era, CEOs Need to Define Redlines

Foreign Affairs | Georgia Levenson Keohane

The Trump administration's actions, including attempts to influence the Federal Reserve, dismissal of statistical commissioners, and assaults on higher education and independent media, pose fundamental systemic risks to the United States' democratic and economic foundations. While corporate America previously embraced stakeholder capitalism and took stands on social issues, the current era is marked by a concerning silence from business leaders, driven by a fear of provoking the president's ire. This quiescence, despite the erosion of the rule of law, compromised agency independence, and attacks on knowledge dissemination, imperils not only the broader system but also corporate bottom lines. The article argues that executives must differentiate commercial concerns from systemic threats, coordinate to define "redlines," and prepare concerted responses to defend the laws, norms, and institutions essential for a stable commercial and civic life, as exemplified by the rare unified advocacy for the Fed's independence during the Trump era in the United States.

Read Full Article →

Can Trump Get a New Nuclear Deal With Iran? Washington Has More Demands—and Tehran Has More Leverage

Foreign Affairs  |  Swanson, Sharp

The United States' ongoing conflict with Iran has seen President Trump struggle to define clear objectives, frequently emphasizing the need to roll back Tehran's nuclear program despite its advancements since the 2018 JCPOA withdrawal. Iran has significantly improved its centrifuge technology and installation speed, reducing its nuclear breakout time to approximately six months, even after U.S.-Israeli strikes. Critical gaps in international inspectors' knowledge persist regarding potential covert facilities and weaponization activities, exacerbated by Iran halting IAEA cooperation following the assassination of Mohsen Fakhrizadeh. A new nuclear deal, therefore, must extend beyond merely addressing uranium enrichment and stockpiles. It requires renewed implementation of the Additional Protocol, comprehensive accounting of centrifuges produced since 2021, and verifiable information on non-nuclear research with potential weapons applications, including access to military sites. While a robust nuclear agreement is essential, it remains insufficient to address Iran's broader strategic threats, such as its missile program and control over the Strait of Hormuz, necessitating a comprehensive approach.

Read Full Article →

How Europe Found Its Nerve: Trump’s Overreach Has Finally Forged Continental Unity

Foreign Affairs | Matthias Matthijs and Nathalie Tocci

Donald Trump's second term, marked by aggressive policies like threatening Greenland, withdrawing support for Ukraine, and instigating an Iran war, has inadvertently galvanized European unity and accelerated its pursuit of strategic autonomy. Initially, European nations attempted appeasement, but Trump's escalating overreach, including a surgical strike on Venezuela and insults to the Pope, made him politically toxic among most European voters. This shift prompted Europe to enhance its collective defense, exemplified by joint military exercises in Greenland and increased financial and military aid to Ukraine, despite initial far-right opposition. The EU is also rebuilding its defense industrial base with a $175 billion financing program and actively forging new trade agreements with partners like India, Australia, and Mercosur to reduce dependence on the United States and mitigate Chinese coercion. Furthermore, the Iran war-induced energy crisis has underscored the security imperative of accelerating Europe's clean energy transition, leading to policy changes aimed at making electricity cheaper than fossil fuels.

Read Full Article →

Moscow’s views of the war of tomorrow

NATO Defense College  |  Andrew Monaghan

Russia's strategic outlook on "tomorrow's war" fundamentally diverges from NATO's, anticipating a large-scale global confrontation driven by geoeconomic factors and U.S. instability rather than a localized European conflict. Moscow's primary concern is a U.S.-led "21st-century blitzkrieg," characterized by coordinated missile strikes and highly mobile, multi-domain forces, with a significant focus on maritime threats. In response, Russia is actively preparing for full mobilization warfare, which includes modernizing its nuclear triad, reconstituting large ground formations, and deeply integrating its armed forces into the national socioeconomic structure. Despite the ongoing conflict in Ukraine, Russia's formal military doctrine remains largely unchanged, with adaptations primarily tactical rather than strategic, indicating a consistent long-term view of future conflict, as detailed in the Future Series publication.

Read Full Article →

The Root of Today’s Global Imbalances

Project Syndicate  |  Lee Jong-Wha

Global economic imbalances are re-emerging as a significant concern, driven primarily by domestic saving-investment dynamics and the complex interplay of geopolitical rivalry, technological competition, and international capital flows. The United States is currently experiencing substantial current-account deficits, while China has returned to considerable surpluses, mirroring patterns that historically precede economic instability. These persistent imbalances, which are again dominating international economic debates, pose serious risks, including abrupt capital-flow reversals, heightened exchange-rate volatility, and the potential for increased geopolitical conflict. The article warns that without coordinated international action to proactively manage these associated risks, the world faces the danger of these tensions escalating into another global economic crisis, similar to the 2008 financial meltdown. Effective global cooperation is essential to prevent severe economic disruptions and maintain stability in the international financial system.

Read Full Article →

Ukraine’s drone war gives Kyiv new hope as Russian assaults bog down

The Washington Times  |  Guillaume Ptak

Ukraine's military has dramatically replenished its optimism, effectively halting Russia's spring offensive through the widespread and innovative deployment of drones. A critical "kill zone," initially 20 kilometers deep, is expanding as midrange strike drones extend precision strikes, rendering Russian vehicle operations ineffective. Drones now execute over 80% of battlefield strikes, fundamentally reshaping warfare doctrine from artillery-centric engagements. This technological advantage, supported by a rapid defense innovation ecosystem, allows Ukrainian units to quickly destroy Russian armored vehicles and conduct deeper strikes against logistics, command posts, and even Russian drone teams. Ukrainian forces are constantly adapting drone capabilities, extending ranges and integrating AI for enhanced targeting and electronic warfare resistance. Despite Russia's superior manpower and industrial base, Kyiv's drone strategy has significantly improved its defensive posture and fostered a cautious outlook for limited counter-advances. However, challenges persist, including infantry exhaustion and a heavy reliance on volunteer support for critical drone procurement, as official supply channels meet only a fraction of operational needs.

Read Full Article →

May Day: The Energy Wars and the evolution of Multi-Polar World Order

Niti Shastra  |  Navroop Singh, Himja Parekh

The 2026 global energy crisis, triggered by escalating conflicts in the Persian Gulf and the closure of the Strait of Hormuz, has compelled numerous nations to implement stringent energy conservation measures, reminiscent of the COVID era. Amidst this, significant geopolitical realignments are unfolding, highlighted by the BRICS Foreign Ministers' meeting in New Delhi where Russia assured India of stable energy supplies and Iran condemned US-Israeli aggression, framing the US as a declining hegemon. Concurrently, US President Trump's visit to China saw President Xi Jinping assert Taiwan as a critical red line while advocating for cooperation to avoid the Thucydides Trap. The article details the precarious state of global oil markets, with US Strategic Petroleum Reserve levels plummeting and the impending expiration of the Russian oil sanction waiver threatening further supply disruptions. This complex scenario underscores a broader "energy war" where the US seeks to maintain petrodollar hegemony by undermining cheap Russian, Gulf, and Iranian energy, while emerging powers like China and a diversifying Saudi Arabia challenge this dominance.

Read Full Article →

Quantum computing: A tech race Europe could win?

BBC  |  John Laurenson

Europe is positioning itself to become a significant contender in the global quantum computing race, with France emerging as a key player through companies like Alice & Bob. This French startup is developing "cat qubits" designed for autonomous error correction, a novel approach that theoretically reduces complexity and cost compared to rivals relying on massive redundancy. The strategic implications of quantum computing are vast, promising to revolutionize fields such as medicine by enabling the simulation of molecular interactions currently intractable for classical computers, leading to a potential "winner-takes-all" market. France's strong physics education, evidenced by recent Nobel laureates, and government initiatives like the PROQCIMA program, provide a robust foundation. While Europe missed previous tech revolutions, there is a strong belief that its current scientific prowess and capital investment could secure a leading position in this critical technological domain, fostering economic autonomy and global competitiveness.

Read Full Article →